Agenda and minutes

Venue: Main Conference Room, Service Headquarters, Fulwood

Contact: Diane Brooks,  Principal Member Services Officer

Items
No. Item

55/17

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies were received from County Councillor Nikki Hennessy.

56/17

Disclosure of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Interests

Members are asked to consider any pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests they may have to disclose to the meeting in relation to matters under consideration on the agenda.

Minutes:

None received.

57/17

Minutes of the Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 117 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED: - That the Minutes of the last meeting held on 21 March 2018 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

58/17

Gender Pay Gap pdf icon PDF 97 KB

Minutes:

At the previous meeting it was agreed that this extraordinary meeting be called to discuss this item in more detail (resolution 47/17 refers). 

 

The Equality Act (2010) (Specific Duties and Public Authorities) Regulations 2017 came into force on 31 March 2017.  These regulations imposed a legal obligation for employees with 250 or more employees to publish gender pay details by 30 March 2018 and to highlight the difference in gross pay and bonus payments made to female as compared with male employees.

 

The Service had and was making improvements in gender breakdown difference, with the latest recruitment processes for whole-time recruitment showing clear progress. The Service had also had for many years clear pay structure arrangements (as outlined in the Pay Settlement) which provided for equal pay for both men and women across the roles throughout the organisation.  Members had previously endorsed the single status approach for “green book” employees utilising the local authority job evaluation methodology and had adopted the living wage principles.  It therefore did not have a direct equal pay issue within the Service.  (Men and women who carried out the same jobs or similar jobs or work of equal value were paid the same).

 

It was recognised, however, that like all fire and rescue services the Authority had an unbalanced spread of male and female employees in the different occupational staff groups and at different levels and roles. A significant factor was the different construction of Terms and Conditions and remuneration between the “Grey” and “Green” book roles. These factors reflected the diversity and differences in activity and requirements.  These were two significant reasons for the gender pay gap outcomes.

 

In addition the mean gender pay gap was significantly affected by the inclusion of certain groups and the official methodology utilised to calculate the position. The guidelines for the Gender Pay Gap calculation were to enable comparisons to be made across employers. In LFRS this provided an unexpected outcome, if dual contract and Retained Duty System (RDS) employees were included in the total calculation (as highlighted in the report). This outcome was a positive female differential in the mean as opposed to the median calculation. Although any national formula was likely to have unexpected outcomes, this was considered by the Executive to be a distortion due to the makeup of these two particular groups. A truer reflection would be to report the figure without inclusion of the RDS element in the headline figure. If these two groups of staff were excluded then a negative pay gap would be the outcome, which was more in line with the expectation and the national position, as well as other fire services.

 

The Director of People and Development confirmed he was confident of the figures presented.  It was noted that the majority of companies (60%) had not submitted a return yet. 

 

The Chief Fire Officer confirmed that LFRS did not have different pay scales for men and women for the same role.  The gender pay gap report was concerned with  ...  view the full minutes text for item 58/17

59/17

Date and Time of Next Meeting

The next scheduled meeting of the Committee has been agreed for 10:00 hours on 21 May 2018 in the Main Conference Room, at Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service Headquarters, Fulwood.

 

Further meetings are scheduled for 26 September 2018, 28 November 2018 and 27 March 2019.

Minutes:

The next meeting of the Committee would be held on Monday 21 May 2018 at 1000 hours in the Main Conference Room at Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service Headquarters, Fulwood.

 

Further meeting dates were noted for 26 September 2018, 28 November 2019 and 27 March 2019.

60/17

Urgent Business - The Kerslake Report

An item of business may only be considered under this heading where, by reason of special circumstances to be recorded in the Minutes, the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion that the item should be considered as a matter of urgency.  Wherever possible, the Clerk should be given advance warning of any Member’s intention to raise a matter under this heading.

Minutes:

The Chief Fire Officer advised that following the publication of the Kerslake report the previous day, he had written to all staff advising that the report was a reminder to everyone in the emergency services that we must review and learn from every incident to ensure public safety.  He confirmed that when he became Chief his messages to staff stressed the need for risk awareness; assessing and balancing risk and taking risk in a measured way. 

 

The Deputy Chief Fire Officer (DCFO) advised that after any major incident the Service was not complacent and we looked for ways to learn and assure ourselves. 

 

He advised the joint emergency services interoperability programme was a joint operational model that helped to bring together available information, reconcile objectives and make effective decisions when Police, Fire and Ambulance Services responded together at major incidents.

 

He confirmed that LFRS National Interagency Liaison Officer (NILO) group worked closely with the Police.  NILOs were security cleared and they gained access to really good situational awareness at an early stage of an incident.  As reported to a recent Audit Committee meeting LFRS was in the process of providing these officers with ballistic protection to avoid the non-wearing of a certain type of PPE to be a barrier to accessing and receiving information on the incident ground.  LFRS was absolutely clear of the expectation that staff attend a multi-agency rendezvous point to adjust planning assumptions from there. 

 

In response to a question raised by Councillor Williams the Deputy Chief Fire Officer confirmed that the Police were in charge if there was a threat to life, the Fire Service if there was a fire and the Ambulance Service if there was a medical emergency.