Minutes:
It was noted that arrangements were in place within the old Best Value (BV) Family Group 4 to compile comparative data in respect of the two (now withdrawn) National Fire Indicators that related specifically to fire authorities.
Data was provided for the six components that made up the two National Indicators in respect of: the position of each Fire and Rescue Service within the Family Group, 2015/16 – 2016/17 comparative progress/decline; percentage change in terms of actual numbers; the position of each F&RS within the comparative group for the respective indicator and a summary overview in graphical form.
Members examined each indicator in turn and noted Lancashire’s position.
National Indicator 33 – Number of deliberate (i) primary and (ii) secondary fires per 10,000 population.
NI 33 – Arson Incidents (deliberate fires) per 10,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
5 |
17.5 |
16.0 |
-8.96 |
2591 |
2359 |
-8.96 |
NI 33i Deliberate primary fires per 10,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
6 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.05 |
534 |
550 |
3.05 |
NI 33ii Deliberate secondary fires per 10,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
6 |
13.9 |
12.2 |
-12.07 |
2058 |
1809 |
-12.07 |
National Indicator 49 – Number of primary fires and related fatalities and non?fatal casualties (excluding precautionary checkups) per 100,000 population.
NI 49i Number of primary fires per 100,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
4 |
147.4 |
142.8 |
-3.12 |
2179 |
2111 |
-3.12 |
NI49ii Number of fatalities in primary fires per 100,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
4 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
-32.79 |
9 |
6 |
-32.79 |
NI49iii Number of non-fatal casualties in primary fires per 100,000 population
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2016/17 |
BV – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
Actuals – 4th Quarter YTD Comparison 2015/16 – 2016/17 |
||||
Position |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
% +/- |
12 |
4.5 |
4.8 |
5.96 |
67 |
71 |
5.96 |
The Assistant Chief Fire Officer tabled the Response Improvement Performance Report for April 2015 to March 2016 which recorded the Service response times against our Fire Rescue Service’s family group. Members were advised that the data for 2016/17 should be available to Members later in the year.
Average Response Times for Primary Fires (Minutes)
Position in Family Group YTD 2015/16 |
|||
Position |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
% +/- |
2 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
1.66 |
Average Response Times for Dwelling Fires
Position in Family Group 2015/16 |
|||
Position |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
% +/- |
2 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
-1.19 |
Average Response Times for Other Building Fires
Position in Family Group 2015/16 |
|||
Position |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
% +/- |
3 |
8.1 |
8.4 |
3.59 |
Average Response Times for Road Vehicle Fires
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2015/16 |
|||
Position |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
% +/- |
4 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
1.43 |
Average Response Times for Other Outdoor Fires
Position in Family Group 4th Quarter YTD 2015/16 |
|||
Position |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
% +/- |
4 |
9.7 |
10.9 |
12.31 |
RESOLVED:- That the Committee note the content of the report and the comparative outcomes.