Minutes:
The Director of Corporate Services (DoCS) advised that this report set out the current budget position in respect of the 2024/25 revenue and capital budgets.
Revenue Budget
In February 2024 the Combined Fire Authority (CFA) agreed the Service’s 2024/25 revenue budget at £75.155m. This Financial Monitoring report was for the ten-month period to the end of January 2025. The forecast outturn was £74.066m, which was an underspend of (£1.089m). Of the forecast underspend, (£0.962m) related to non-pay costs, and (£0.127m) to pay costs.
The year-to-date and forecast positions within all departmental budgets were set out in Appendix 1 of the report, with the major variances of note shown separately in the table below.
Area |
Year to Date Variance
£m |
Reason |
Forecast Outturn Variance £m |
Reason |
Service Delivery - Pay |
0.509 |
As previously reported the grey book pay award of 4% for 2025/26 was effective from July 2024 and was 1% higher than the services budgeted assumptions, this accounted for the majority of the overspend. |
0.516 |
The variance was largely due to higher than budgeted pay assumptions. On call and support staff budgets were mainly within allocated budgets. The forecast had reduced by c£0.150m since the November report due to a reduction in overtime costs. |
Prevention and Protection - Pay |
(0.418) |
The year-to-date underspend was due to vacancies within the department. |
(0.550) |
The variance was due to vacancies, this saving had increased by (c£0.100m) as staffing levels were anticipated to increase. |
Bank Interest |
(0.385) |
More interest had been earned because of higher cash balances invested, due to slippage on the capital programme, and higher than budgeted interest rates. Interest earned on the Home Office pension grant received ahead of Matthews two and the McCloud remedy had been assumed to be transferred to an earmarked reserve. |
(0.552) |
The forecast reflected the full year effect of slippage on the capital programme and higher than budgeted interest rates. The forecast had increased by c£0.350m due to updated cash balance and interest rate assumptions. |
Property – non pay |
(0.394) |
Utility rates had been lower than budgeted resulting in the underspend. |
(0.393) |
The forecast underspend largely related to lower than budgeted utility costs. The forecast also assumed any committed property work slippage would be approved to carry forward which was forecast at £0.400m. |
Future Pressures
Emerging pressures to report to the Resources Committee included inflation forecasts. As reported to the CFA in February, government grants were increased by the September rate of inflation (1.7%). The latest rate of inflation was now 3% which was likely to put pressure on budgets in 2025/26.
There were no further new pressures to report since the last meeting, the green book pay award and firefighter employer pension contributions had been included in the 2025/26 budget approved by the CFA in February.
Savings Targets
A reduction in the contribution to Capital of £1.5m was agreed in the medium-term Financial Strategy resulting in a revenue contribution in 2024/25 of £2.5m. The budget had been reduced to this effect.
General Fund
The year end forecasted general fund position is summarised below:
|
£'m |
Opening balance of LFRS general fund |
(4.987) |
Forecast revenue underspend |
(1.089) |
Forecast closing balance of general fund |
(6.076) |
Capital Budget
The original Capital Programme for 2024/25 was £12m including slippage from 2023/24, this was revised to £5m by the CFA in February 2025 when they approved the updated capital strategy. To date £2.793m had been spent predominantly on fleet and operational equipment. A summary of the programme is set out in the table below and in more detail in Appendix 2 of the report.
Area |
Budgeted Items |
Budget (£m) |
Year to Date (£m) |
Slippage 2025/26 (£m) |
Operational Vehicles
|
The budget included costs of two water towers, and a prime mover. All vehicles were on target to be delivered in 2024/25. An update on items in the original budget is below:
|
1.409 |
0.924 |
(0.002) |
Other vehicles
|
This budget allowed for the replacement of various operational support vehicles including several cars, vans, and a beavertail lorry. A few vehicles had been delivered which was originally expected to be delayed to 2025/26, an update against the original budget is provided below:
|
0.529 |
0.710 |
(0.181) |
Operational Equipment
|
This budget allowed for operational equipment purchases including CCTV cameras for appliances, body armour, and road traffic collision equipment. Slippage against the original capital programme is set out below:
|
1.359 |
0.959 |
0.361 |
Building Modifications
|
This budget included the continued programme of Drill Tower Replacements, Blackpool facilities upgrade and budget for the initial works to support the upgrade to Preston station. Slippage to date against the original capital programme had been identified as follows:
|
1.066 |
0.153 |
0.266 |
IT systems
|
This budget included various projects including upgraded Firewalls, network upgrades and replacement of pooled PPE and stock management systems. Slippage to date against the original capital programme had been identified as follows:
|
0.850 |
0.197 |
0.448 |
Potential Financial Risks
There were several potential scenarios that had not been reflected in this monitoring report that, if they materialised, may give rise to an increase in revenue and capital expenditure. To provide some information about potential significant financial risks these had been quantified to provide an estimated worst-case scenario, these were set out in Appendix 3 of the report. Taking all these risks overall and adjusted for the remainder of the year, a potential worst-case scenario would impact the Revenue Budget and Capital Budget accordingly:
£m |
Worst Case |
Revenue Budget - unbudgeted costs |
1.08 |
Capital Budget – Additional Expenditure |
0.22 |
The potential worst-case scenario could be funded from available budgets but would reduce the general fund balance to below the minimum acceptable level agreed by the CFA.
County Councillor D O’Toole and Councillor D Smith remarked that it was very difficult to forecast the budget due to a number of changing factors including central governments imminent budget announcement.
Resolved: That the Committee;
Supporting documents: