Minutes:
The report set out the current budget position in respect of the 2016/17 revenue and capital budgets and performance against savings targets.
Revenue Budget
The overall position as at the end of January showed an underspend of £1.6m, with a forecast breakeven position at year end, after allowing for the transfer of £2.3m into the capital funding reserve as reported at the February Combined Fire Authority meeting. The transfer to capital funding reserve would be met from forecast underspend as set out in the report, predominantly relating to pay, as well the following areas which were reported at the last Resources Committee, where a virement transferring the budget into the Non DFM budget heading had been actioned:
The Committee was provided with detailed information regarding the position, along with the forecast outturn major variances within individual departments as summarised below: -
Area |
Over/(Under) spend at 31 Jan |
Forecast Outturn |
Reason |
|
£’000 |
£’000 |
|
Property |
(185) |
(143) |
The underspend related to spend against planned repairs and maintenance as property department capacity was almost fully occupied with the working on the current capital projects. It was expected that this would result in a similar level of underspend by year end. In addition it reflected previous year’s investment in property assets. A full stock condition survey had been carried out, the results were expected before the end of March, which would indicate where and how much future investment may be required. The repairs and maintenance budget for 2017/18 had been reduced by £100k in anticipation of the expected results. |
Service Delivery |
(234) |
(279) |
The underspend reflected the continued reductions in spending across many budget headings, for which next year’s budget had been reduced, the single most significant element of which was the ongoing underspend on smoke detectors and fire safety consumables as the new Home Fire Safety Check process continued to be embedded within the service. Utilities were also forecast to be underspent, reflecting past and ongoing energy efficiency measures. Next year’s budget had been adjusted to reflect the out-turn position. |
Pay - wholetime |
(409) |
(422) |
The majority of the underspend related to difference between budgeted staffing numbers and actual staffing number. Personnel had continued to leave the Service without accruing full pension benefits, with a further 16 personnel doing this since the budget was set, and we anticipated a further 2 more between now and the year end. (This was not allowed for in the budget for 2016/17 as it was not clear whether this was related to changes to the pension schemes or not, however it was now apparent that this trend would continue and hence next year’s budget had been amended to reflect this). A further element of underspend related to a combination of the timing of costs of ad hoc payments such as overtime and public holidays, and the mix of personnel in each of the pension schemes. All of these had been reviewed and updated in next year’s budget. |
Pay - RDS |
(350) |
(369) |
The underspend related to the shortfall in respect of hours of cover provided, which was higher than allowed for in the budget, reflecting the ongoing issues in terms of recruitment and retention. This was compounded by a greater number of RDS personnel still being in development than forecast, again reflecting turnover rates. However we had carried out RDS recruitment exercises in November and March to alleviate the potential issue. The Retained budget also included an additional £600k in relation to the Strengthening and Improving RDS project, to design an RDS pay scheme which resulted in improved recruitment, retention and availability. As reported to the CFA in February the change had been referred to the Fire Brigades Union regional/national council for approval and hence implementation was currently on hold. |
Pay – Support Staff |
(220) |
(283) |
The underspend related to turnover of various specialist and administrative roles during the year, when we had assumed that as all previous staffing reviews had been implemented prior to the start of the year there would be minimal changes. This had been reflected in next year’s budget by increasing assumed vacancies to 2.5%. |
Non-DFM |
35 |
1,679 |
The year-end position reflected the transfer of £2.3m revenue underspends into the capital funding reserve as referred to above. |
Capital Budget
The Capital Programme for 2016/17 stood at £8.823m. A review of the programme had been undertaken to identify progress against the schemes as set out below: -
|
Committed spend to Jan 17 £m |
Forecast Slippage Into 1718 £m |
|
Pumping Appliances |
0.269 |
(0.696) |
Committed spend to date related to the purchase of 5 pumping appliances for the 2016/17 programme, which had been ordered and were currently in build; since the last report we were now aware that delivery of these had been delayed to during May 2017. We were forecasting a £14k overspend on this as final contract prices were marginally higher than anticipated. This had been built into future capital budgets. |
Other vehicles |
0.126 |
(0.436) |
Committed spend to date related to various support vehicles which had either been delivered or had been ordered.
The slippage related to:-
|
Operational Equipment/Future Firefighting |
0.523 |
(0.425) |
This £1m budget was set aside to meet the costs of innovations in firefighting equipment, and the spend to date and year end position reflected the purchase of various items, including:
In addition, the Fire Authority had given approval to purchase technical rescue jackets for non-fire related incidents, however this was unlikely to result in spend during the current financial year so would slip forwards to 2017/18. |
Building Modifications |
2.149 |
(2.975) |
The majority of committed spend to date related to:
The forecast slippage related to:-
Discussions remained on-going with the Council in respect of the strip of land that we currently leased for car parking spaces to enhance the overall scheme.
|
IT systems |
0.063 |
(0.630) |
Committed spend to date related to the final stages of the phased implementation of the replacement asset management system which began during the last financial year, and the upgrade of the Community Risk Management Information System (CFRMIS).
The slippage related to:-
|
`
Members were also provided details that set out the capital programme and the expenditure position against this, as reflected above. The costs to date would be met largely by revenue contributions, with capital grant funding the costs to date of Lancaster Redevelopment. Following discussions the Home Office had agreed that the underspend on the capital grant which related to the construction of Day Crewing Plus (DCP) accommodation at Skelmersdale, £45k, could be carried forward to offset increased costs at Lancaster.
Delivery against savings targets
The current position on savings identified during the budget setting process, was reported. The performance to date was ahead of target due to a combination of the underspend on salaries for the year to date, plus savings in respect of procurement activities during the same period. We had already exceeded our savings target for the financial year.
RESOLVED: - That:
i) the financial position be noted; and
ii) the virements to adjust for underspends previously identified to part fund the transfer to capital reserves at the end of the year be endorsed.
Supporting documents: