Minutes:
Councillor Williams apologised for being late and he now took the chair.
The Director of Corporate Services advised that this report set out the current budget position in respect of the 2022/23 revenue and capital budgets.
Revenue Budget
The overall position at the end of August was an overspend of £0.3m, largely as a result of price increases associated with energy and fuel.
The year-to-date positions within individual departments were set out in the report with major variances relating to non-pay spends and variances on the pay budget being shown separately in the table below: -
Area |
Overspend/ (Under spend) |
Reason |
|
£’000 |
|
Fleet & Technical services |
104 |
The increase in fuel prices was reflected in the overspend to date. The budget allowed for 12.5% increase in fuel costs, but the actual increase was significantly higher than this, approx. 50%, which equated to approx. £125k. In terms of usage, it was too early to base any year end forecast on this, but the situation would continue to be monitored. In addition, repairs costs had increased reflecting works needed in the first quarter of the year and the increase in costs due to inflationary pressures. |
Information Technology |
84 |
The overspend to date was attributable to a combination of the timing of expenditure, with software licenses being paid up front, and a general increase in costs, again reflecting inflationary pressures. |
Property |
190 |
The increase in energy prices was reflected in the overspend to date. The budget allowed for 25% increase in fuel costs, but the actual increase was significantly higher than this, approx. 100%, which equated to approx. £300k. In terms of usage, it was too early to base any year end forecast on this, but the situation would continue to be monitored. In addition, an increase had been seen in maintenance costs aligned with inflationary pressures, which would potentially lead to further overspend in year but again it was too early to predict that at the present time. |
Wholetime Pay |
(73) |
The majority of the underspend was attributable to the slight shortfall in recruit numbers at the start of the year. Retirements and leavers were broadly in line with forecast. |
On Call Pay |
34 |
This was broadly in line with budget. |
Support staff (less agency staff) |
60 |
The budget was adjusted to take account of the increased level of vacant support posts within the Service. Whilst a number of posts remained vacant, agency staff were being utilised to fill some of these, resulting in an overspend to date, however it was anticipated that this would slow down in the second half of the year as recruiting to posts was anticipated therefore, reducing the reliance on agency staff. |
Apprentice Levy |
(16) |
The apprentice levy was payable at 0.5% of each month’s payroll costs with expenditure slightly less than budgeted. |
The report highlighted that inflationary pressures were causing costs to increase in several areas, most notably fuel and energy. Forecast usage/costs were currently being reviewed in order to estimate the likely out-turn position. However far more significant than this was the potential costs associated with pay awards. The budget allowed for 2% pay awards for both grey and green book personnel. The current pay offer for green book personnel approximated to 5% and whilst the existing pay offer for grey book personnel was one of 2% it appeared unlikely that this would be accepted (with the FBU having announced they intended to ballot members on this). As such it was clear that the existing budgetary provision would be insufficient to meet in year pay increases. In order to provide indicative figures, if the overall pay budget increased by 5% (in line with the current green book offer) as opposed to the 2% budget there would be a shortfall in excess of £1m.
It would not be possible to identify in-year savings to offset this and utilising reserves would therefore be needed. The Authority currently held £6.0m of general reserves, having agreed a minimum level of £4.0m, and as such was able to utilise £2.0m of this to offset any in year pressures, although clearly this was a short-term measure only.
Anticipated spend would be reviewed in order to identify a year end forecast for reporting to the November Resources Committee.
Capital Budget
The capital budget currently stood at £9.0m, after allowing for the year end slippage agreed at the previous Committee meeting. Spend to date was just £0.5m. The latest year end forecasts for the various capital projects had been reviewed, and an in-year spend of £3.3m was currently anticipated. This would lead to slippage of £5.7m, a very significant number but one which, for the main part, was attributable to market conditions.
The following table shows spend to date as well as the anticipated year end position:
|
Spend to 30 August |
Year End Forecast |
|
|
£m |
£m |
|
Operational vehicles |
- |
0.9 |
The budget allowed for the replacement of various operational vehicles. 13 pumping appliances had already been ordered (7 this year and 6 next year), 2 Command Units and an ALP. Having reviewed lead times, and staged payment dates, the current anticipated year end spend was approximately £0.9m, resulting in slippage of £2.2m. This would be kept under review, and would be subject to change due to the current difficulty in obtaining raw materials etc. |
Support vehicles |
0.1 |
0.4 |
This budget allowed for the replacement of various operational support vehicles, whilst some of these had already been delivered, the shortage of raw materials was affecting both the timeframe for delivery and the cost of vehicles. Latest predictions indicated that approx. 50% of the programme would be completed in year, at a cost of £0.4m, with the balance sipping into 2023/24. |
Operational Equipment |
0.1 |
0.3 |
A £0.3m spend was anticipated from piloting CCTV on a number of pumping appliances and the replacement of light portable pumps. However, it appeared unlikely that any in year expenditure would be incurred in respect of the replacement of cutting and extrication equipment where the project was in the early stages and where costs may change depending on the type of equipment purchased and whether this was a whole scale replacement or not. It was therefore anticipated this budget would slip (£1.5m into next year) |
Building Modifications |
0.3 |
0.8 |
This budget allowed for:
|
IT systems |
- |
0.9 |
The majority of the capital budget related to the national Emergency Services Mobile Communications Project (ESMCP), to replace the Airwave wide area radio system and the replacement of the station end mobilising system. The ESMCP project budget, £1.0m, was offset by anticipated grant, however the timing of both expenditure and grant was dependent upon progress against the national project. This national project had suffered lengthy delays to date, hence was included within slippage into the next financial year. The balance of the budget related to the replacement of various systems and ICT hardware, in line with the ICT asset management plan. Whilst no costs had been incurred in the year so far, it was highlighted that contracts had been awarded or were in the process of being awarded for several of the systems, with an anticipated year end spend of £1.0m. The balance of the budget, £0.5m, related to systems/replacements which were likely to slip into 2023/24. |
Total |
0.5 |
3.3 |
|
The costs to date would be met by revenue contributions.
It was noted that significant cost increases across various supply chains continued to be seen, in particular in construction projects and this would affect some of the capital projects as they progressed through the procurement stage.
In response to a question raised by County Councillor S Rigby the Director of Corporate Services advised that there was some flexibility with Revenue Contributions to Capital Outlay. He added that any budget decisions would be made at year end, bearing in mind rising costs and the scale of the pay award.
In response to a further question regarding energy conservation measures across Service premises, the Director of Corporate Services advised that the Authority had agreed a Carbon Management Plan (which looked at reducing and controlling these costs) and new buildings needed to comply with BREEAM technical standards. The challenge was refurbishing some of the older building stock including Service Headquarters. He advised that within the capital building programme was a budget for the relocation of Service Headquarters however, this was a very large project that would need to be reviewed in light of rising costs. Efficiency measures taken included energy efficient heating, light sensors, low water usage taps etc.
RESOLVED: - That the Committee:
i) Noted and endorsed the financial position; and
ii) Approved slippage of £5.7m into 2023/24
Supporting documents: