Minutes:
The Director of Corporate Services presented the report which set out the current budget position in respect of the 2021/22 revenue and capital budgets and performance against savings targets.
The overall position at the end of September was an underspend of £0.2m, with a forecast outturn position of an underspend of £0.4m. Both were a combination of the level of staffing vacancies, the slow return to business-as-usual spending activities, less the funding gap identified at budget setting and the unbudgeted pay awards.
The year to date and forecast positions within individual departments were set out in the report with major variances relating to non-pay spends and variances on the pay budget being shown separately in the table below: -
Area |
Overspend/ (Under spend) |
Reason |
|
|
30 Sept 2021 |
Forecast |
|
|
£’000 |
|
|
Service Delivery |
(51) |
(104) |
The underspend for both the first six months, and the year-end forecast, largely related to the reduced activity levels in the following areas:
|
Covid-19 |
- |
- |
We have received total funding of £1.6m since March 2020. In addition, as previously reported, we have transferred £0.2m of travel/mileage budgets into this reserve to reflect savings in respect of differing working practices during the pandemic, resulting in total funding of £1.8m. We have spent £1.7m to the end of September, as follows:
With effect from 1 September, LFRS reduced the level of support offered to the large vaccination centres, handing over control back to the NHS. The remaining had been partially utilised during October, with some staff overtime and the order for personal issue P3 masks costing £21k, leaving an estimated balance of £50k for use in November/December. |
TOR |
(44) |
(209) |
The current and forecast underspend largely related to the position with apprentice levy income for wholetime recruits. At the time of setting the budget it was anticipated that the recruit numbers would fully utilise the balance in the levy account, therefore the income budget was set at £0.2m. During the year, levy drawdown forecasts had been updated as follows:
TOR had been catching up on training during the year and spend on external training was currently in line with budget. |
Property |
(203) |
(148) |
Whilst non-essential maintenance was re-instated prior to the end of the last financial year, departmental capacity due to a vacant surveyor post, and the ongoing situation meant that there was an underspend to date. The post was filled from the start of November; therefore the outturn forecast assumed that there would be some catch up spend for the final few months, reducing the current level of underspend. |
Non DFM |
273 |
582 |
Both the year to date and outturn overspend position reflected:
|
Wholetime Pay (including associate trainer costs) |
114 |
66 |
As previously reported there had been significantly more early leavers than allowed for in the budget. At the end of September, we had 10 fewer wholetime members of staff than budgeted, resulting in an underspend of circa £200k against budgeted establishment levels. It was extremely hard to predict leavers for the remainder of the year, however assuming that early leavers slowed down in the second half of the year, we anticipated an underspend against establishment of approx. £0.5m. In addition, as previously reported, there was a shortfall in recruit numbers this year, with 35 recruits compared with a budgeted 48, which lead to a further underspend of £130k. Broadly speaking these were offset by:-
The net of all the above factors was the forecast overspend of £66k, however it should be noted that if we continued to experience higher than expected early leavers this overspend may reduce or, in all probability, become an underspend. |
On Call Pay |
(42) |
(49) |
The position within On-call staffing was slightly underspent, with the unbudgeted pay award being more than offset by higher staff vacancies than budgeted. |
Support staff (less agency staff) |
(228) |
(239) |
The underspend related to vacant posts across various departments, circa 12% of the establishment in early October, far in excess of the 3.75% vacancy factor built into the budget. This was partly offset by spend on agency staff, which amounted to £41k in the period. Although recruitment activity had now recommenced the labour market had become more challenging and we were experiencing difficulties in filling posts. As such we anticipated the high level of vacancies remaining throughout the year. This would be partly offset by the eventual pay award for green book staff. This had not yet been agreed, but the pay offer has been increased to 1.75%, which had been reflected in the forecast outturn position which would be updated as we progressed through the year. |
Apprentice Levy |
(9) |
(23) |
The apprentice levy was payable at 0.5% of each months payroll costs, the budget for this was set at anticipated establishment levels, hence the underspend against this budget reflected the various pay budget underspends reported above. |
It was noted that significant cost increases across various supply chains, and in particular in construction projects was being seen and this may affect the final outturn expenditure levels. This would continue to be monitored, and other trends, to ensure that they were reflected in future year’s budgets, as well as being reported to Resources Committee.
Grant Funding
The Authority receives specific grants from the Government in respect of various new initiatives. These were included in the revenue budget position but were shown separately in the report. The forecast outturn assumed that all grant was spent in year, but any that was not would be carried forward as an earmarked reserve to use in the new year.
Capital Budget
The approved capital budget for 2021/22 stood at £4.4m.
It was noted that following discussions with the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Committee the budget had been increased to allow for the purchase of a second Haglund to enhance operational response to emergencies in remote/inaccessible locations. These machines were ex-military machines which used rubber tracks instead of wheels, had low ground pressure, despite their size, and could cross soft ground with relative ease. This capability enabled the Service to provide year-round emergency cover in response to natural disasters across the County, especially flooding, which was becoming more severe and intense. The original capital budget allowed for the purchase of one such machine, and a Climate Change Operational Response Plan was currently being drafted which would recommend the purchase of a second machine. Initially it had been planned to include this in next year’s capital programme, but the supplier confirmed that buying both at the same time would generate a saving of £9k across both machines.
To date £2.7m of the programme had been committed, with an anticipated year end spend of £4.0m, as set out below: -
|
Spend to 30 Sept 2021 |
|
|
£m |
|
Other vehicles |
0.2 |
This budget allowed for the replacement of various operational support vehicles. Whilst some of the operational support vehicles had been ordered and delivered, others were still being reviewed and it appeared increasingly unlikely that the budget would be fully utilised in year. |
Operational Equipment / Future Firefighting |
0.1 |
This budget allowed for
The anticipated slippage relating to the latter two programmes |
Building Modifications |
2.4 |
This budget allowed for:
As with the revenue budget, current departmental capacity to progress these was previously limited, hence the slippage indicated in Appendix 2. |
IT systems |
- |
The budget related to the replacement of various systems and ICT hardware, in line with the ICT asset management plan. Whilst initial scoping work was on-going to facilitate the replacement of some of these systems, utilising the budget in the current year was still forecast. |
The committed costs to date would be met by revenue contributions (£2.4m) and capital reserves (£0.3m). With the remaining in year spend being funded from a further £1.3m use of capital reserves.
As highlighted earlier significant cost increases were being seen across various supply chains, and in particular in construction projects and this may affect some of the capital projects as they progressed through the procurement stage.
Delivery against savings targets
The performance to date was already ahead of the annual target, largely due to staffing vacancies.
In response to a question raised by County Councillor Pattison regarding whether the apprentice scheme had an age limit the Director of People and Development confirmed that the Service recruited apprentices at the start of their career with the fire service which could be aged 18 or much older. The Deputy Chief Fire Officer advised that apprentice operational firefighters had a minimum age of 18. The Service also recruited apprentices for green book staff from the age of 16.
In response to a question raised by County Councillor Beavers regarding continued provision of covid support monies, the Director of Corporate Services advised that the Government had previously issued funding in tranches. The Service was currently awaiting a decision on the ongoing level of funding in light of the recent new covid-19 variant (Omicron) and any potential impact on the Service given the pace of its support to the vaccination programme had slowed in recent months.
Councillor Williams commented that nationally, businesses appeared to be experiencing recruitment problems. He expressed concern regarding firefighters leaving before their pensionable age and the challenge of recruiting back-office staff.
RESOLVED: - That the Committee:
i) Noted and endorsed the financial position; and
ii) Approved the virement to transfer £68k RCCO into the capital programme to fund the purchase of an all-terrain vehicle.
Supporting documents: