Contents
Impact on Critical Fire Response
Impact on Critical Special Service Response
Average Engine Availability over daily 24hr period
Impact on Prevention and Protection Activity
Impact Other Resources (mobilisations)
1. Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service has robust systems in place to monitor, manage, and dynamically deploy our fire engines and firefighters to respond to emergencies across Lancashire.
2. There are 58 fire engines and a number of specialist appliances in the county however some are often unavailable due to many reasons: ongoing incidents, training, maintenance, leave or sickness absence; unavailability of on-call staff; and other operational reasons.
3. When there is a crewing shortage, we take steps to keep a fire engine or specialist appliance available, by bringing in firefighters from other stations (we call this detaching) or on overtime.
4. With improved technology and access to more comprehensive data, we now have a greater understanding of fire risk across Lancashire. As a result, we have changed this approach to ensure sufficient resources are available in the areas that need them and reduce unnecessary overtime.
5. Firefighters who crew a second fire engine may be detached to maintain the availability of a first fire engine somewhere else, making that fire engine temporarily unavailable. This only occurs when the first fire engine is available as well as other fire engines in the area and this ensures we maintain a balanced level of fire cover across the county.
6. This forms part of a dynamic, risk-based approach to managing resources effectively.
7. Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service continually assesses and adjusts our operational resources to ensure the best possible emergency response across the county.
8. Using technology, we can see at any given time where live incidents are located, which fire engines are attending, which fire engines are available, and which are temporarily offline for training, maintenance, or crewing. This data is combined with five years’ previous incident data to highlight community risk, enabling us to position fire engines in precisely the locations they are needed.
9. Every decision we make is guided by our commitment to public safety. Whether it’s moving a fire engine to cover a neighbouring area or investing in new technology, our goal is always the same: to ensure that every community in Lancashire receives a timely and effective emergency response.
10. The Dynamic Resource Management (DRM) policy came into effect on 1 July 2025, it is a policy which provides steps which can be taken prior to using overtime to fill shortfalls, such as redistributing the crew from second fire engines at two pump wholetime stations where there is adequate fire cover in the area.
11. The four, two pump wholetime stations within LFRS are; Blackburn, Blackpool, Burnley, and Preston. DRM will only be enacted if the first fire engine at that station and neighbouring station(s) are available, the table below highlights which engines must be available to enact DRM:
|
DRM Stations |
Engines that must be available to enact DRM |
||
|
Blackburn |
Blackburn P1 |
Darwen P1 |
|
|
Blackpool |
Blackpool P1 |
Bispham P1 |
South Shore P1 |
|
Burnley |
Burnley P1 |
Nelson P1 |
|
|
Preston |
Preston P1 |
Fulwood P1 |
Penwortham P1 |
|
Appliance |
DRM |
Jul-25 |
Aug-25 |
Sep-25 |
Oct-25 |
Nov-25 |
Dec-25 |
|
Blackpool |
57 |
11 |
14 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
10 |
|
Preston |
57 |
6 |
20 |
7 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
|
Blackburn |
52 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
13 |
8 |
10 |
|
Burnley |
42 |
3 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
5 |
3 |
|
Total |
208 |
26 |
53 |
31 |
37 |
28 |
33 |
|
Engine |
# DRM |
% DRM |
|
|
Q2 |
Q3 |
||
|
Blackpool |
33 |
24 |
15% |
|
Preston |
33 |
24 |
15% |
|
Blackburn |
21 |
31 |
14% |
|
Burnley |
23 |
19 |
11% |
|
Total |
110 |
98 |
14% |
*Data from 01/07/25 – 31/12/2025
12. DRM has been used a total of 208 times in Q2 (July – September) and Q3 (October – December). 208 occasions out of a total of 1472 available shifts across the four stations in that timeframe, representing DRM being enacted on 14% of available shifts.
13. Critical fire incidents are defined as incidents that are likely to involve a significant threat to life, structures or the environment. Our response standards, in respect of critical fires, are variable and are determined by the risk map (KPI 2.1) and subsequent risk grade of the Super Output Area (SOA) in which the fire occurred. The response standards include call handling and fire engine response time for the first fire engine attending a critical fire, and are as follows:

14.When reviewing our critical fire response times and any impacts since DRM has been initiated, there has been no detrimental impact on any incident outcomes. In the current year, there have been fewer fires in low and medium risk LSOAs and an increase in high and very high risk LSOAs, when compared to the previous year. Across the four stations where DRM is enacted, response times have improved when compared to the same period last year, in all but the low-risk category, though this remains substantially under the 12-minute average response time target. Since DRM was introduced at the start of quarter 2 (Q2), overall response times at DRM stations have improved by 8 seconds, whereas response times across all stations over the same period have increased by 9 seconds. Whilst DRM cannot be attributed to the improved response times, it does highlight that DRM has not had detrimental impacts on response times and public safety.
|
DRM Stations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
|||||||||||||
|
L |
12 |
07:41 |
20 |
07:57 |
16 |
06:33 |
9 |
07:07 |
11 |
07:58 |
12 |
07:10 |
14 |
07:33 |
45 |
07:25 |
37 |
|||||||||||
|
M |
10 |
06:23 |
51 |
06:03 |
44 |
06:20 |
61 |
05:46 |
45 |
06:10 |
46 |
06:08 |
39 |
06:16 |
156 |
06:01 |
130 |
|||||||||||
|
H |
8 |
06:13 |
11 |
05:39 |
9 |
05:45 |
17 |
05:21 |
14 |
06:44 |
14 |
05:34 |
19 |
05:52 |
37 |
05:51 |
47 |
|||||||||||
|
VH |
6 |
05:36 |
6 |
05:38 |
7 |
05:50 |
9 |
05:50 |
11 |
04:35 |
5 |
05:48 |
9 |
05:42 |
22 |
05:34 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
Overall |
06:36 |
88 |
06:22 |
76 |
06:12 |
96 |
05:53 |
81 |
06:34 |
77 |
06:18 |
81 |
06:23 |
260 |
06:15 |
239 |
||||||||||||
|
Blackburn Station |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
|||||||||||||
|
L |
12 |
10:21 |
4 |
09:29 |
3 |
05:31 |
1 |
07:12 |
3 |
08:43 |
6 |
10:08 |
3 |
09:25 |
8 |
08:41 |
12 |
|||||||||||
|
M |
10 |
06:36 |
16 |
06:32 |
13 |
06:19 |
24 |
06:46 |
12 |
06:20 |
21 |
05:53 |
18 |
06:27 |
53 |
06:17 |
51 |
|||||||||||
|
H |
8 |
05:49 |
3 |
05:55 |
2 |
06:51 |
2 |
03:38 |
1 |
05:11 |
2 |
05:00 |
3 |
06:08 |
7 |
04:50 |
6 |
|||||||||||
|
VH |
6 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
05:11 |
1 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
05:11 |
1 |
- |
0 |
|||||||||||
|
Overall |
07:09 |
23 |
06:57 |
18 |
06:17 |
28 |
06:39 |
16 |
07:03 |
29 |
06:51 |
24 |
06:45 |
69 |
06:34 |
69 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Blackpool Station |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
|||||||||||||
|
L |
12 |
07:16 |
8 |
08:13 |
7 |
06:26 |
4 |
04:03 |
1 |
07:26 |
4 |
07:19 |
2 |
07:27 |
19 |
06:55 |
7 |
|||||||||||
|
M |
10 |
05:46 |
11 |
07:48 |
6 |
05:26 |
9 |
05:07 |
19 |
05:38 |
8 |
04:16 |
2 |
06:07 |
26 |
05:12 |
29 |
|||||||||||
|
H |
8 |
05:20 |
6 |
05:38 |
4 |
05:07 |
7 |
07:07 |
1 |
05:30 |
3 |
- |
0 |
05:19 |
17 |
05:54 |
4 |
|||||||||||
|
VH |
6 |
05:26 |
4 |
05:31 |
3 |
05:51 |
4 |
05:19 |
8 |
04:35 |
5 |
05:27 |
8 |
05:37 |
11 |
05:11 |
21 |
|||||||||||
|
Overall |
06:03 |
29 |
07:10 |
20 |
05:35 |
24 |
05:12 |
29 |
05:42 |
20 |
05:34 |
12 |
06:12 |
73 |
05:26 |
61 |
||||||||||||
|
Burnley Station |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
L |
12 |
04:56 |
3 |
08:30 |
2 |
06:56 |
2 |
08:58 |
4 |
- |
0 |
06:18 |
6 |
06:31 |
7 |
07:22 |
10 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
M |
10 |
06:16 |
15 |
04:48 |
15 |
05:47 |
10 |
05:37 |
5 |
06:03 |
10 |
06:50 |
9 |
05:36 |
40 |
06:15 |
24 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
H |
8 |
- |
0 |
05:28 |
1 |
05:30 |
2 |
05:10 |
7 |
06:56 |
4 |
05:28 |
10 |
05:29 |
3 |
05:39 |
21 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
VH |
6 |
03:09 |
1 |
04:00 |
2 |
03:54 |
1 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
03:46 |
4 |
- |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Overall |
05:53 |
19 |
05:08 |
20 |
05:47 |
15 |
06:15 |
16 |
06:18 |
14 |
06:09 |
25 |
05:35 |
54 |
06:13 |
55 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Preston Station |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
L |
12 |
07:51 |
5 |
06:02 |
4 |
06:54 |
2 |
05:34 |
3 |
06:49 |
2 |
05:51 |
3 |
07:01 |
11 |
05:59 |
8 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
M |
10 |
06:57 |
9 |
06:16 |
10 |
07:08 |
18 |
05:52 |
9 |
06:26 |
7 |
06:22 |
10 |
06:51 |
37 |
06:13 |
26 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
H |
8 |
09:29 |
2 |
05:29 |
2 |
06:12 |
6 |
05:37 |
5 |
07:56 |
5 |
06:02 |
6 |
06:43 |
10 |
06:30 |
16 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
VH |
6 |
08:40 |
1 |
07:25 |
2 |
06:41 |
3 |
07:14 |
3 |
- |
0 |
08:34 |
1 |
07:15 |
6 |
07:34 |
4 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Overall |
07:37 |
17 |
06:16 |
18 |
06:52 |
29 |
05:58 |
20 |
07:01 |
14 |
06:18 |
20 |
06:54 |
64 |
06:22 |
54 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Incidents in Very
High Risk (VH) Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA) in the Preston
station area have not met the specified response standard in the
previous year to date, or the current year to date. There has
only been one critical fire in a VH risk LSOA in Preston area since
the introduction of DRM. DRM was in place when the incident
occurred, but a standby appliance from Bamber Bridge was available
on station at Preston and responded. Analysis of the response
times shows that travel time and extended call handling times were
the main cause behind a delayed response. The low numbers of
incidents, six in 2024/25 and four in 2025/26 mean that a single
slower response will have an exaggerated impact on the average
figure. When reporting all stations performance, this impact
is reduced and the overall response time is within the prescribed
standard (six minutes).
|
All LFRS Stations |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Risk |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
||
|
L |
12 |
08:51 |
118 |
09:02 |
111 |
08:20 |
107 |
09:07 |
124 |
09:18 |
138 |
08:57 |
125 |
08:45 |
336 |
09:08 |
387 |
|
M |
10 |
07:00 |
174 |
06:54 |
132 |
07:35 |
158 |
07:05 |
172 |
07:05 |
140 |
07:22 |
140 |
07:10 |
464 |
07:10 |
452 |
|
H |
8 |
07:12 |
22 |
06:35 |
24 |
06:09 |
29 |
05:37 |
30 |
06:38 |
29 |
06:09 |
32 |
06:36 |
75 |
06:08 |
91 |
|
VH |
6 |
06:02 |
10 |
05:55 |
10 |
06:03 |
12 |
05:49 |
15 |
04:57 |
8 |
05:31 |
11 |
06:00 |
32 |
05:31 |
34 |
|
Overall |
07:40 |
324 |
07:42 |
277 |
07:39 |
306 |
07:38 |
341 |
07:59 |
315 |
07:52 |
308 |
07:40 |
907 |
07:48 |
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.Critical special service incidents are non-fire incidents where there is a risk to life, for example, road traffic collisions, rescues and hazardous materials incidents. For these incidents there is a single response standard which measures call handling time and fire engine response time.
16. When reviewing our critical special service response times and any impacts since DRM has been initiated, there has been little impact as a direct result of DRM. In Q1 to Q3 2025, there were 579 critical special service incidents within the four station areas where DRM occurs. Since DRM was introduced at the start of Q2, overall response times at DRM stations have increased by 30 seconds compared with Q1 to Q3 2024, whereas response times across all stations over the same period have increased by eight seconds. Whilst this is a higher increase than overall, our response times remain substantially under the 13-minute average response time target, and our Key Performance Indicator demonstrates that performance levels continue to be met since the introduction of DRM.
|
Critical Special Service Response |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Station |
Target (Mins) |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Previous Year to Date |
Year to Date |
||||||||||||||
|
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
Q1 |
Incs |
Q2 |
Incs |
Q3 |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
mm:ss |
Incs |
||||
|
Blackburn |
13 |
08:12 |
66 |
07:54 |
56 |
08:31 |
73 |
09:01 |
53 |
09:09 |
61 |
08:47 |
43 |
07:38 |
195 |
09:00 |
157 |
||
|
Blackpool |
06:47 |
56 |
06:40 |
47 |
06:28 |
57 |
07:38 |
62 |
06:48 |
52 |
07:08 |
53 |
08:14 |
160 |
07:13 |
167 |
|||
|
Burnley |
07:18 |
48 |
06:50 |
44 |
07:48 |
53 |
07:28 |
35 |
08:12 |
42 |
06:53 |
36 |
06:38 |
145 |
07:33 |
113 |
|||
|
Preston |
07:46 |
45 |
08:45 |
54 |
08:11 |
43 |
07:57 |
49 |
09:40 |
49 |
08:32 |
44 |
07:21 |
142 |
08:43 |
142 |
|||
|
DRM Stations |
07:32 |
215 |
07:37 |
201 |
07:46 |
226 |
08:03 |
199 |
08:29 |
204 |
07:50 |
176 |
07:38 |
642 |
08:08 |
579 |
|||
|
LFRS Overall |
08:22 |
716 |
08:36 |
690 |
08:49 |
741 |
08:38 |
666 |
08:45 |
681 |
08:47 |
672 |
08:36 |
2147 |
08:44 |
2019 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
17. As highlighted at the start of this paper, not every fire engine is always available due to various reasons. Robust performance monitoring is in place through various KPIs, below is a breakdown of average engine availability by month.
|
|
|
2024 |
2025 |
Avg. Avail. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
Pumps Avail (OC) |
21 |
21 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
23 |
22 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
23 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
|
|
Pumps Avail (WT) |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
26 |
25 |
26 |
|
|
Pumps Avail (All) |
47 |
47 |
46 |
46 |
46 |
47 |
48 |
49 |
50 |
51 |
49 |
48 |
50 |
50 |
49 |
49 |
48 |
49 |
49 |
50 |
49 |
48 |
|
18. Whilst the average number of Wholetime fire engines available has occasionally reduced from 1 July 2025, On-Call fire engine availability has increased and whilst there is typically a drop in availability over the summer periods, there is still a significant upward trend compared to the 2024 summer period. Combined availability has resulted in LFRS maintaining an average of 48 fire engines available at any one time since DRM has been instigated, which is higher than the average availability over the same period last year.

19.Dynamic Resource Management aims to reduce the usage of overtime and overall budgetary pressures. Once DRM is enacted and a fire engine has been taken off the run, the remaining crew are redistributed to fill shortfalls as required.
20.The number of overtime shifts/activities recorded in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 (July – December) was 116.
This is compared with 1479 in Q2 & Q3 2024/25, a reduction of 1363 overtime shifts.

21.116 Overtime shifts across the six months represent a cost of £47,185. For the same period in 2024, the overtime expenditure was £596,270, this equates to a saving of £549,085. This figure includes on-costs (such as national insurance, but not employer pension as overtime is non-pensionable) and is for overtime shifts directly related to maintaining fire engine availability.
To enable direct comparison, one pay figure has been used (2025), therefore the 2024 cost will be slightly over reported as a 3.2% pay rise was awarded from July 2025.

22.Average detachments have been increasing year on year, and the number of detachments has increased over the same period in 2025 compared to 2024. This is to be expected with DRM as staff are detached to cover shortfalls at other stations. When staff go on detachments, overtime or time owing is incurred for travel to and from each detachment. This is capped at a total of 3 hours and can be taken as time or payment; the costs of detachments are significantly less than a full overtime shift. Detached duty payments for 2025 Q2 & Q3 were £22,055. In 2024 the cost of detachments in Q2 & Q3 was £21,198 (equivalent including 2025 pay rise), representing a 4% increase in Q2 & Q3 2025. Firefighters are increasingly choosing to take time rather than payment, which may ultimately have a detrimental impact on staff availability due to taking this time back.
The actual numbers of detachments in Q2 & Q3 2025 increased by only 0.6% from 713 in 2024, to 717 in 2025.
23.Enacting DRM and temporarily removing a resource from a two-pump station for a shift is anticipated to reduce the available time to complete prevention and protection activity.
Overall, LFRS operational crews carried out 16% less Business Fire Safety Checks (BFSC) in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 compared with Q2 & Q3 2024/25. It is anticipated that enacting DRM will impact the activity at neighbouring stations due to an increase in mobilisations, however stations eligible for DRM and their neighbours have experienced a smaller drop in BFSC numbers of 13%.
A reduction in Home Fire Safety Checks (HFSCs) was also seen in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 compared with Q2 & Q3 2024/25 at DRM stations, though this similar to the reduction across all stations. DRM and neighbouring stations experienced a slightly larger reduction, potentially indicating that the increased activity for neighbouring appliances may be having an impact.
Whilst there has been a small reduction in HFSC and BFSC numbers over the period, we are still above targets for both measures.
Business Fire Safety and Home Fire Safety Checks
|
2024/25 – 2025/26 Q2 &Q3 Comparison % Change |
||||||
|
|
BFSC |
HFSC |
||||
|
Stations |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Diff. |
2024/25 |
2025/26 |
Diff. |
|
All Ops |
1541 |
1292 |
-16% |
6272 |
5508 |
-12% |
|
DRM Stations |
650 |
556 |
-14% |
1820 |
1526 |
-16% |
|
DRM & Neighbouring Stations |
1139 |
994 |
-13% |
3561 |
3002 |
-16% |
|
Non-DRM Stations |
891 |
736 |
-17% |
4452 |
3982 |
-11% |
24.By removing a fire engine for a full shift, it can be assumed that incident activity (mobilisations) will increase for the remaining, and neighbouring engine.
As can be seen by the trend lines (linear) in the chart below, incidents have been increasing slightly year on year since 2018/19. Mobilisations have also been increasing, but at a greater rate.

25. Beyond prevention activities, Lancashire FRS has little control over the number of incidents which it faces annually. However, policy decisions can have an impact on the number of mobilisations. Two examples are the Automatic Fire Alarm (AFA) policy, which has been amended over recent years to remove non-life risk premises, and assisting other agencies through gaining entry requests which LFRS carries out on behalf of Lancashire Police. Gaining entry accounts for 8% of all incidents at wholetime stations.
26. Comparing Preston Q2 & Q3 over the previous eight years, as expected, Preston L50P2 has received fewer mobilisations than average; whilst Preston L50P1, Penwortham L57P1 and Fulwood L52P1 have all experienced increases in mobilisations, Penwortham L57P1 is the only fire engine out of the expected range of deviation. Bamber Bridge L53P1 has experienced a reduction in mobilisations, whilst within the expected deviation, it is nonetheless surprising and indicates that Penwortham are picking up the majority of the extra mobilisations. This may be attributed to Fulwood being On Call at night, rather than incident location.
|
Fiscal Year |
Quarter |
L50P1 |
L50P2 |
L57P1 |
L52P1 |
L53P1 |
|
2018-2019 |
Q2 & Q3 |
539 |
739 |
543 |
427 |
554 |
|
2019-2020 |
Q2 & Q3 |
540 |
852 |
495 |
453 |
495 |
|
2020-2021 |
Q2 & Q3 |
493 |
830 |
449 |
452 |
457 |
|
2021-2022 |
Q2 & Q3 |
547 |
983 |
559 |
503 |
535 |
|
2022-2023 |
Q2 & Q3 |
589 |
989 |
661 |
557 |
514 |
|
2023-2024 |
Q2 & Q3 |
650 |
961 |
610 |
606 |
575 |
|
2024-2025 |
Q2 & Q3 |
550 |
867 |
612 |
512 |
457 |
|
2025-2026 |
Q2 & Q3 |
600 |
874 |
651 |
531 |
494 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Avg 2018/19-2024/25 |
558 |
889 |
561 |
501 |
512 |
|
|
Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25 |
46 |
86 |
68 |
59 |
42 |
|
|
Deviation 2025/26 |
42 |
-15 |
90 |
30 |
-18 |
|

27. Comparing Blackpool area Q2 & Q3 mobilisations over the previous eight years, Blackpool L30P2 has experienced reduced mobilisations, but in line with standard deviation. Most of the mobilisations appear to have been absorbed by Blackpool L30P1, with Bispham L31P1 and South Shore L37P1 also seeing an increase beyond standard deviation. Fleetwood L32P1 and St. Annes L36P1 have experienced fewer than average mobilisations, L36P1 has changed crewing to FDC during this period which may account for a reduction in activity. The reduction at both these stations is within expected standard deviation.
|
Fiscal Year |
Quarter |
L30P1 |
L30P2 |
L31P1 |
L32P1 |
L36P1 |
L37P1 |
|
2018-2019 |
Q2 & Q3 |
448 |
724 |
455 |
322 |
311 |
517 |
|
2019-2020 |
Q2 & Q3 |
398 |
769 |
442 |
390 |
297 |
549 |
|
2020-2021 |
Q2 & Q3 |
364 |
744 |
461 |
410 |
319 |
548 |
|
2021-2022 |
Q2 & Q3 |
399 |
812 |
426 |
431 |
321 |
676 |
|
2022-2023 |
Q2 & Q3 |
444 |
819 |
481 |
396 |
372 |
682 |
|
2023-2024 |
Q2 & Q3 |
465 |
802 |
505 |
413 |
330 |
646 |
|
2024-2025 |
Q2 & Q3 |
462 |
759 |
506 |
356 |
312 |
591 |
|
2025-2026 |
Q2 & Q3 |
565 |
753 |
534 |
374 |
318 |
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Avg 2018/19-2024/25 |
426 |
776 |
468 |
388 |
323 |
601 |
|
|
Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25 |
36 |
34 |
28 |
35 |
22 |
62 |
|
|
Deviation 2025/26 |
139 |
-23 |
66 |
-14 |
-5 |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

28. Comparing Q2 & Q3 mobilisations in Blackburn and neighbouring stations over the previous eight years, despite DRM being enacted in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 Blackburn L71P2 has experienced greater than average mobilisations, but at 16 more than average, this is well within standard deviation. L71P1 has seen an expected increase in mobilisations, but only five more than expected standard deviation. All other station mobilisations have fallen within the expected range, with Darwen L76P1 receiving the greatest increase.
|
Fiscal Year |
Quarter |
L71P1 |
L71P2 |
L76P1 |
L70P1 |
|
2018-2019 |
Q2 & Q3 |
531 |
1004 |
340 |
749 |
|
2019-2020 |
Q2 & Q3 |
423 |
880 |
325 |
693 |
|
2020-2021 |
Q2 & Q3 |
428 |
868 |
364 |
755 |
|
2021-2022 |
Q2 & Q3 |
463 |
946 |
482 |
768 |
|
2022-2023 |
Q2 & Q3 |
542 |
973 |
466 |
829 |
|
2023-2024 |
Q2 & Q3 |
508 |
915 |
393 |
764 |
|
2024-2025 |
Q2 & Q3 |
469 |
812 |
381 |
876 |
|
2025-2026 |
Q2 & Q3 |
530 |
930 |
438 |
810 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Avg 2018/19-2024/25 |
481 |
914 |
393 |
776 |
|
|
Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25 |
44 |
61 |
56 |
55 |
|
|
Deviation 2025/26 |
49 |
16 |
45 |
34 |
|

29. Comparing Q2 & Q3 mobilisations in Burnley and neighbouring stations over the previous eight years, Burnley L90P2 has received 100 fewer mobilisations than average, almost double the standard deviation for that fire engine. Burnley L90P1 was mobilised on 86 occasions over the average, which is 49 more than standard deviation. Nelson L94P1 and Padiham L92P1 mobilisations do not appear to have been affected. It is hard to identify any other stations/appliances which have experienced an increase in mobilisations due to DRM at Burnley, indicating that Burnley L90P1 was able to absorb most of the mobilisations normally attended by L90P2.
|
Fiscal Year |
Quarter |
L90P1 |
L90P2 |
L92P1 |
L94P1 |
|
2018-2019 |
Q2 & Q3 |
416 |
710 |
158 |
466 |
|
2019-2020 |
Q2 & Q3 |
377 |
739 |
119 |
434 |
|
2020-2021 |
Q2 & Q3 |
322 |
669 |
162 |
438 |
|
2021-2022 |
Q2 & Q3 |
357 |
732 |
106 |
531 |
|
2022-2023 |
Q2 & Q3 |
439 |
842 |
140 |
569 |
|
2023-2024 |
Q2 & Q3 |
360 |
702 |
117 |
508 |
|
2024-2025 |
Q2 & Q3 |
406 |
679 |
100 |
491 |
|
2025-2026 |
Q2 & Q3 |
468 |
625 |
136 |
495 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Avg 2018/19-2024/25 |
382 |
725 |
129 |
491 |
|
|
Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25 |
37 |
53 |
23 |
46 |
|
|
Deviation 2025/26 |
86 |
-100 |
7 |
4 |
|
